Explanation​:
A is a simple beta decay reaction.
B is an alpha decay reaction.
C is the type of fission reaction that occurs in a nuclear reactor for the generation of electricity with uranium as a fuel.
D shows a fission reaction that would require an input of energy to occur. It does not take place in a fission reactor.

Explanation​:
The number of protons on both sides of the equation must be the same.

2+A=B+0

Therefore the answer is D.

Explanation​:

Energy of the incident photon ($E=hf$), goes into:

1. releasing an electron (hfA​ and hfB​ respectively), and
2. imparting kinetic energy to the electron. Since stopping voltage converts this kinetic energy into electrical potential energy, this is measured by eVA​ and eVB​ for respective materials.

Since the second plate takes more energy to release the electron (∵fB​>fA​), it gets less kinetic energy after release, and hence smaller stopping potential.

The wave model assumes that the energy from the light is delivered in one continuous wave. As the wavelengths of the lasers are equal, the property that would increase intensity would be the amplitude of the light wave.

In the particle model, light is composed of photons. The photon energy for each laser is equal, so a higher intensity is achieved by when there are more photons emitted per second.

Explanation​:
$Q$ has a mass number of 234 and atomic number of 90. This means that Q has 234 nucleons, and 90 protons.

Since beta particles have mass number zero and charge number $-1$, the nucleus will gain a $+2$ charge while the mass number will remain unchanged. This gives a mass number of 234 and the charge number will become 92.

In the next step, the emission of 1 alpha particle will diminish the mass number by 4 and the charge number by 2 resulting in $R$ having a mass number of 230 and a charge number of 90.

Explanation​:
Count all possible de-excitations below n=4.
From $n=4$ electron can de-excite to n=3,2,1 ; 3 possible frequencies.
From $n=3$ electron can de-excite to n=2,1; 2 possible frequencies.
From $n=2$ electron can de-excite to $n=1$; 1 possible frequency.

Total of 6 frequencies.

Explanation​:
A change in the proton composition of a nucleus is needed to label it as a different nucleus. Both alpha ($\alpha$) and Beta ($\beta$) decay change the proton and neutron number of the parent nucleus therefore a different daughter will be produced. On the other hand, gamma ($\gamma$) decay involves only the loss of excess energy, not the change in nucleon composition therefore the daughter is the same as the parent.

Therefore, the answer is C.

Explanation​:
A.  The drop in the count rate is considerable but does not completely drop off to zero. The remaining count can easily be explained by the presence of background radiation. This indicates that the emission from the source is almost completely blocked by the sheet of paper. Alpha is the only type of radiation that can be nearly completely stopped by a sheet of paper.

B.  If both alpha and beta were being emitted in equal numbers, the sheet of paper would block the alpha but an appreciable amount would penetrate through the paper as beta radiation. So the count rate after the paper is inserted should be larger than the recorded value.

C.  If only beta radiation was emitted, the count rate would not have significantly diminished after the paper was inserted because beta radiation is able to penetrate through paper and if that is the only type of radiation, there is no reason for the count to fall that far.

D.  The information is sufficient to draw a reasonable conclusion. That conclusion is expressed in answer A.

Explanation​:

With more kinetic energy, alpha particles can overcome the electrical potential of the nucleus, and get close enough to experience strong nuclear attraction that is responsible for the deviation from Rutherford's model.

A smaller proton number for the target nuclei means a lower positive charge, and hence a lower potential barrier to overcome. Again, this enables alpha particles to approach the nucleus much closer, and increases the chance of strong nuclear interaction, thus causing a deviation from Rutherford's prediction.

Explanation​:
The moderator slows down neutrons so that they can cause successful fissions. Without a moderator, neutrons that are the product of other fissions have too much energy to interact with new nuclei such that they cause further fissions to occur.

Control rods block the neutrons to reduce the number of chain reaction fissions.

The heat exchanger transfers thermal energy to the external steam generator circuit.

A chain reaction is a process, not a specific material.

Explanation​:

The stars have greater mass have higher luminosity which results in a shorter time to run out of hydrogen. Therefore, the lifetime of a star on the main sequence is roughly inversely proportional to the mass of the star. Since the star has greater mass than the sun, time is less than $T$.

Moreover, the mass of the star is less than four times the solar mass. Hence, it is a moderate-mass star and it will become a red giant in its next evolutionary stage.

Explanation​:
Statement I is true. The nuclear binding energy is the energy released when a nucleus is formed from its constituent nucleons. The final nucleus will have less mass than the separately considered nucleons, and the difference in that mass is known as the mass defect. The mass defect is related to the binding energy of the nucleus by ΔE=Δmc^2.

Statement II is true, as it gives the definition of nuclear binding energy.

Statement III is not true. The energy required to remove a particle from a nucleus is similar to the binding energy per nucleon.

Stars with a mass up to 4 times the mass of the sun will form a white dwarf. If their mass is between roughly 4 and 8 solar masses, they will form a neutron star. If the mass is greater than roughly 8 solar masses, they will form a black hole.

Explanation​:

By considering the position of the red giants and the Sun on an H-R diagram, it is easy to say that red giants have higher luminosity and lower temperature than Sun. But they are not big enough like supergiants to have a volume that could include the Sun and inner planets inside.

I: CORRECT Decreasing the wavelength is the same as increasing the frequency of the incident radiation. This increases the quantum of photon energy and results in the emission of electrons.

II: INCORRECT Higher intensity of the same light, has no effect on the electrons. Since each photon still carries the same energy as before.

III: CORRECT Reducing the threshold frequency might lead to a point where it is less than the frequency of the incident light (c/λ), and hence result in emission of electrons.

Explanation​:
The lengths of the arrows represent the amount of energy released in the transition.

From the formula E=hc/λ​

It is send that the energy of a photon is inversely proportional to its wavelength, therefore the decreasing order of wavelengths will be the increasing order of energies, which is given in C.

The lowest energy transition is shown as λ1​, therefore the λ1​ photon will have the longest wavelength.

λ2​ has the largest energy and therfore will have the shortest wavelength.

Explanation​:

I is incorrect: Photoelectric effect reflects the particle behavior of light.

II is correct: In the Davisson-Germer experiment electrons were scattered from atoms and these scattered electrons produced an interference pattern just like waves.

III is incorrect: Young's double slit experiment shows wave behavior of light

Explanation​:

All photons carry the same energy (corresponding to the frequency of yellow light).

That means the maximum kinetic energy is the same for electrons in both cases. Hence equal stopping voltages.

Hence higher intensity implies larger number of photons per second, and thus larger number of electrons ejected, leading to a higher current. Thus i2>i1

Explanation​:

The aluminum nucleus has fewer protons than the gold nucleus hence the effects of repulsion are less for the aluminum nucleus when compared with the gold.

The particles will be able to have a closer approach to the aluminum, and the gold will cause more scattering than the aluminum due to its stronger charge.

Explanation​:

The decay constant depends on the radioactive material. It does not change for a given nuclide. In this case it is $\lambda$ for both samples as they are the same nuclide. Hence, I is incorrect.

Activity depends on the mass of the sample. If it is $A$ for mass $m$ at $t=0$, it will be $2A$ for $2m$. But after two half lives, it will be halved twice and become A/2​. So, II is correct.

After one half life, half of $2m$ decays, and will leave a mass m decayed, while another m is active. After the second half life, half of the remaining $m$ decays leaving just another m/2​ active. So the total mass of decayed material is 3m/2​. Hence III is incorrect.